What a difficult subject. In an effort to reboot the franchise, Paramount turned to acclaimed director J.J. Abrams to create a back-to-its-roots Star Trek movie. A movie designed to remove the off-putting complexities of the more recent series and films, breathe new life into the series and make the Star Trek world incredibly enticing for people otherwise not interested in the franchise.
This makes it hard, y'see the company has broken the golden rule of marketing. NEVER go for the audience you'll never ever win over, you're wasting time and money for a revenue you'll never make back. However, using this goal as a guide, the film is highly successful. IT removes the techno-babble, it removes the thick lore and history of Star Trek, trimming it back to the memorable characters and throwing in much more epic action sequences to really make the package much more enticing. To someone with a potent dislike of Star Trek, this film is incredibly open and very very fun to watch. This means it achieves its goal. However will it make fans out of those new audience members? Most likely not, but that remains to be seen. If that audience doesn't come, or come back, this film will already be a failure.
However onto what a fan wants (Being a big big fan myself). One of Abrams' goals was to not just open Star Trek up, but to create a memorable tale for long term Trek fans to love and adore. What's not to like afterall, it's the ORIGINAL CREW all back in action to kick some major ass!? Well... actually there is a huge amount not to like.
First of all, this is a refresh. And yet in comes Leonard Nimoy AS the original Spock. First major issue. This film rewrites the entire of Trek Lore (Or more accurately, shits on it and throws it away). As a key example, the planet Vulcan is destroyed forever and completely gone, and Spock's mum is dead. Bit of a major change that, and a good example of how much they threw away. And for your information, yes that IS a permanent change. Now if you were to consider this a total refresh, doing away with the old and in with something fresh and new, that would be fine. Except it's now NOT something totally fresh and new, cos the original Spock is in it. That means to create this alternate reality you have to purposely destroy the entire of Star Trek. You're not just building a new reality, you're physically ripping apart the original one. That is a big big mistake. And massive major error number 1.
Massive major error number 2, who the fuck are these enemies? Romulans? Don't think so somehow, don't look like it. Why is every Romulan tattooed if they're supposed to be the ones from the original continuity? That dun make sense. They're also on a mining vessel, which is heavily armed (apparently with no upgrades for these armaments which makes no sense) which includes no Remens. Again this ship is supposed to be from the original continuity, where original Spock comes from, yet it is totally wrong. The ship doesn't even look Romulan, but it does look Remen. Someone took a 5 minute look at Nemesis and based everything off of that, seemingly confusing Romulans and Remens and ending up making neither in the process. Fail.
Massive Error number 3, Uhura and Spock romance. Now this in itself would have been okay, I could accept it and find it a cool addition, except it was done pathetically. Snogging in front of all staff before going on an away mission? Spock wouldn't do that! Nor would Uhura actually. As an almost unspoken but tense undercurrent romance it would have been perfect, but as a blatant snog-off as it was it was ridiculous and totally ruined Uhura's character. In fact its a testiment to how badly the entire film was written.
Massive Error number 4, the directing of action scenes. Now most of the scenes were well directed, but especially by the end of the film the action scenes got lame. Not because they weren't well planned, I loved the ideas they had. But the direction was terrible. Too much camera movement, horrific employment of the evil wobblycam meant that alot happened and I witnessed... fuck all =\ You may as well have not shot the bloody action scenes if I can't see them, while it's not as shoddily done as Quantum of Solace the principle is that I can't see any action so why actually bother? You're wasting my time and the studio's money to achieve nothing.
Massive Error number 5, casting was hit and miss. Kirk, Spock, Uhura and McCoy were all spot on. Couldn't fault them as performers, they were entirely believeable. In fact Chekov wasn't bad either, and Sulu was passable. Then there's Pike and Scotty, who were uber epic fail. Pike was far too old for the part, didn't look like Pike and didn't even have Pike's build or maneurisms, he was a total waste of time and although a good actor, was not a good Pike. Scotty was a choice I thought was superb at first, one of the key reasons to see the film, and ended up being rubbish. While alot of this can be attributed to script (which I'll get to in a minute) the fact is that his portrayal of Scotty is all wrong. Scotty was a guy who studied and knew his engines thoroughly inside and out, taking all oppertunity to learn. His comedy was dry and incidental (Such as Trouble with Tribbles where punishing him by confining him to quarters was a benefit to him for his brushing up on tech journals) not bland bravado as shown here. And don't even get me started on that fucking little cunt thing that followed him about. A blatant attempt to appeal to the Gollum/shitheadfromHarryPotter fans from Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, this character was a total insult to being in Star Trek. He made no sense and should have been ejected by any writer/director with any intelligence.
But the most major issue of all was the script. What a waste. Previously mentioned original Spock aside there was alot to deteste in this script. For one my girlfriend has zero interest in Star Trek, and she was put off and confused by the time paradox Spock issue. This means the whole point of this new film (to attract non-fans) has failed. The time paradox was needless and confusing without cause, as it was the only way to restore balance to the shit writing and yet was never exploited for that cause.
There was Uhura's terribly written romance with Spock, there were missing people in Kirk's life (Decker, Gary, Finnigan etc), Kirk's brother Sam is missing quite blatantly, destroying Vulcan is a pathetic idea, Starfleet wouldn't allow Kirk to just "hop aboard" a transport ship without going through Academy. If your dad is a Commando, you don't just hop yourself on the next transport to Iraq and take command, how fucking badly written is that? The addition of characters was bad, how did a 17 year old Chekov manage to become bridge staff over 25 year old academy cadets? Or how did he suddenly become transporter wizzkid when he never showed any of this get-up-and-go in the Original Series? Why is Scotty not actually showing an interest in electronics, instead shagging some little buttmunch child-molesting goblin? Why original Spock at all? Why was the Romulan leader so bland and pointless (If he wanted to destroy Earth etc, take his ship to Romulas to build a fleet of ships from the technology, DUH), and why did none of his crew say "Sorry, I don't think it's clever to pilot our ship into a black hole", oh no they all went along with it very happily. Why was Pike in a wheelchair at the end when his legs were untouched, and when was the truth bug removed from his mouth? Why would you leave a 17 year old Ensign Chekov in charge of the bridge? Why choose the Romulans as enemies to begin with, when the Klingons are a much better enemy (And it's clearly not for continuity purposes as they shat all over that already!)?
But the writing's key problem is that despite the idea of "going-back to it's roots", Abrams new film has done just the opposite. It has in fact removed the very thing that makes Star Trek the entity it is today, and that is moral story. At no point through this film at all was there any hint of emotional or moral undercurrent. The brilliant turmoil of Next Gen's "The Measure of a Man", Voyager's "Real Life", Deep Space Nine's "For The Uniform", The Original Series' "The Doomsday Machine" or "Turnabout Intruder" or even the Movies "The Wrath of Khan" or "The Undiscovered Country"? All the best episodes (And those are but a small few) have a deep emotional or moral meaning behind them, in fact all the best sci-fi and indeed any stories include that undercurrent. That degree of high calibre writing, the tackling of moral or emotional ideals, has been at the heart of Star Trek since day one. Indeed many of the episodes written by Roddenbury himself are heavily centred on the conquering of our preconceptions, prejudices and moral insecurities to help humanity push itself forwards. Was that in this film? NO. The closest we got was Kirk basically fucking about at the end with "we could try and save him and make peace with Romulas", "I'll never give up to you", "Blast him" happy ending. SHIT. The romance and quality of writing is on par with American Ninja, and that's no joke.
Now this isn't because I'm averse to them rejigging Star Trek for new audiences. Indeed, this film got my tastebuds going alot. The idea of fresh blood in the body of Star Trek, the focus on adventure and action, the fresh set of moral tales that could grip me and entertain me all at once. Unfortunately this didn't happen. There was no adventure, no morality tale and much of the action was obscured by jigglycam. The majority of the actors were fantastic, the ship and CGI was beyond impressive and some of the sets were brilliant but the core of the film was missing. This isn't even as good as The Final Frontier, at least that had the feel of Star Trek behind it. This had it sorely missing. Compare this to Wrath of Khan and that 28 year old movie had better writing, better direction, better action and deeper meaning than this film even began to touch. That's because this is Baby Trek, Star Trek for people with little intelligence and a lack of respect for finely tuned and well sculpted storylines, the High School Musical Crowd. Sure Abrams threw us a bone now and then with a few throwbacks, but it was too little and some of it (Pike in the wheelchair) was downright embarassing.
The film earns a bad 4/10 from me, and most of that is because it has a brilliant graphical polish. Considering I paid £130 to get the original series and original films pre-ordered on Blu-Ray on release day (And so you know all but Motion Picture look fantastic on Blu-Ray, well worth your money), what are the chances of me buying this on Blu-Ray? Well... this means alot coming from me (I pay ungodly amounts of money for stuff, £100 headphones and £280 radio for example) but I'm going to get this on Blu-Ray when it gets knocked down to about £10 maybe. When it's cheap and in the bargain bin. It's not good enough to be a worthy purchase. Now excuse me while I go watch my Fifth Element Blu Ray

Close Friends

My Friends

Friends of Legend
Concept Mobius Co-workers/Friends

Clubs
